Conservation refugees and environmental dispossession in 21st century critical Geography
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study explores the relevance of the concepts of conservation refugees and environmental dispossession for steering a middle course between unjust bio-centric conservation and anti-environmentalism of extreme right “populism”. Historical geographers have recently taken up these concepts from contemporary Environmental History, and when with allied to the concepts of environmental ethics from Radical Ecology and Environmental Studies and nature enclosures from Political Ecology, a novel critique is produced of the role of full conservation units in debates surrounding global climate change. This kind of nature reserve is steeped in bio-centric environmental ethics which distill nature and dispossess native peoples and poor peasants. The latter are considered to be anthropic agents who are criminalized, removed and turned into conservation refugees in order to cleanse the landscape of (poor rural) human presence. Drawing on research undertaken on nature enclosures in three threatened biomes of Brazil, hybrid views of society-nature and actor-network assembly from Relational Geography are used to interpret specific cases involving successful resistance to environmental dispossession in which local people forced a change in mentality of nature reserve administrators, turned foe into ally and built socially inclusive conservation strategies.
Downloads
Article Details
References
Adams, W.M., & Mulligan, M. (2003). Introduction. In W.M. Adams & M. Mulligan (Eds.), Decolonizing nature: strategies for conservation in a post-colonial era (pp. 1–15). London: Earthscan.
Araujo, M.H.S., Cruz, C.B.M., & Vicens, R.S. (2007). Levantamento da cobertura vegetal nativa do bioma Mata Atlântica. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto de Estudos Socioambientais do Sul da Bahia.
Bicalho, A.M. (1992). Agricultura e ambiente no município do Rio de Janeiro. In M.A. Abreu (Ed.), Natureza e sociedade no Rio de Janeiro (pp. 285–316). Rio de Janeiro: Prefeitura da Cidade do Rio de Janeiro.
Bicalho, S.M (2009). Steps toward enhancing social capital in the Amazon. In D. C. Wood (Ed.), Climate change, culture, and economics. anthropological investigations (pp. 67-105). Bradford: Emerald Scientific.
Blaikie, P., & Brookfield, H. (1986). Land degradation and society. London: Metheun.
Büscher, B., & Fletcher, R. (2018). Under pressure: conceptualising political ecologies of green wars. Conservation and Society, 18(2), 1–9. www.doi.org/10.4103/cs.cs_18_1
Butler, R. (2012). Threats to rainforests from humankind. https://rainforests.mongabay.com/0803.htm
Cresswell, T. (2013). Geographical thought. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.
Cronin, W. (1983). Changes in the land. Indians, colonists, and the ecology of New England. New York: Hill & Wang.
Cronin, W. (1991). Nature’s metropolis. New York: Norton.
Crosby, A.W. (1986). Ecological imperialism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Davidson, E., Araújo, A., Artaxo, P., Balch, J., Brown, I., Bustamante, M., Coe, M., … Wofsy, S. (2012). The Amazon basin in transition. Nature, 481, 321–328. www.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.08.049
Dean, W. (1995). With broadaxe and firebrand: the destruction of the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
Descola, P. (2013) [2005]. Beyond nature and culture. Chicago: Chicago Univ. Press.
Dowie, M. (2009). Conservation refugees: the hundred-year conflict between global conservation and native peoples. Cambridge, MS: MIT Press.
Forsyth, T. (2003). Critical political ecology: the politics of environmental science. Milton Park: Routledge.
ECOA (2016). Quem somos. Retrieved from www.riosvivos.org.br/institucional-2/ecoa
Foweraker, J. (1981). The struggle for land. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
GCP (Global Carbon Project) (2007). GCP – carbon budget. Retrieved from www.globalcarbonproject.org/ carbonbudget/07/index.htm
Griffin, C., Jones, R., & Robertson, I. (Eds.). (2019). Moral ecologies. histories of conservation, dispossession and resistance. London: Palgrave-Macmillian.
Harvey, D. (2010). The enigma of capital. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
Hecht, S.B., & Cockburn, A. (1990). The fate of the forest. developers, destroyers, and defenders of the Amazon. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hodgetts, T. (2018). Connectivity as a multiple: in, with and as ‘nature’. Area, 50, 83–90. www.doi.org/10.1111/area.12353
Hoefle, S.W. (2000). Patronage and empowerment in the central Amazon. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 19, 479–499. www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-9856.2000.tb00120.x
Hoefle, S.W. (2006). Eliminating scale and killing the goose that laid the golden egg? Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 31, 238–243. www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2006.00203.x
Hoefle, S.W. (2013). Beyond carbon colonialism: frontier peasant livelihoods, spatial mobility and deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Critique of Anthropology 33(3), 193–213. www.doi.org/10.1177/0308275X13478224
Hoefle, S.W. (2016). Multi-functionality, juxtaposition and conflict in the central Amazon: will tourism contribute to rural livelihoods and save the rainforest? Journal of Rural Studies, 44, 24–36. www.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.12.009
Hoefle, S.W. (2019). Ghosts in the forest: the moral ecology of environmental governance toward poor farmers of the Brazilian and US Atlantic Forests. In C. Griffon, R. Jones & I. Robertson (Eds.), Moral ecologies. histories of conservation, dispossession and resistance (pp. 99–125). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hoefle, S.W. & Bicalho, A.M.S.M.. (2016). Nature enclosures: historic peasants versus public and private conservation units of the Paraguay River in the Pantanal wetlands of western Brazil. Belgeo, 4, 1-18. doi.org/10.4000/belgeo.19677.
Holbraad, M., & Pedersen, M.A. (2017). The ontological turn. an anthropological exposition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Huber, M.T. (2017). Industrializing political ecology. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 107, 151–166. www.doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2016.1219249
IBAMA (Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais Renováveis) (2005). Plano de manejo: Floresta Nacional do Tapajós. Brasilia.
IBGE (Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística) (2010). Santarém. Retrieved from www.cidades.ibge.gov.br
ICMBio (Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade) (2018). História. Retrieved from www.parquedatijuca.com.br/historia.php
ICMBio (2013). Aspectos Gerais do Parna Itatiaia. Retrieved from www.icmbio.gov.br/ parnaitatiaia/images/stories/Normas_UP/Aspectos_Gerais.pdf
ICMBio (2014). Floresta Nacional do Tapajos. Retrieved from www.icmbio.gov.br/%20 flonatapajos
ICMBio (2019). Parna Serra dos Órgãos: História, Gestão e Manejo. Retrieved from www.icmbio.gov.br/ parnaserradosorgaos/o-que-fazemos/gestao-e-manejo.html
IHP (Instituto Homem Pantaneiro). (2016). Histórico. Retrieved from www.ihp.org.br/ ?conteudo=canal&canal_id=9
INEA (Instituo Estadual do Ambiente). (2019). Parque Estadual da Pedra Branca. Retrieved from www.inea.rj.gov.br/Portal/Agendas/BIODIVERSIDADEEAREASPROTEGIDAS/Unidadesde Conservacao/INEA_008594
Instituto Acaia (2014). Serra do Amolar. Retrieved from www.acaia.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/RPCSA_2014_Apres_v2.pdf
ISA (Instituto Socioambiental) (2014). Território indígena Bragança/Manituba and Território Indígena Mundukuru/Taquara. Retrieved from www.ti.socioambiental.org/pt-br/terras-indígenas%20/4178/4176
Jacoby, K. (2014) [2001]. Crimes against nature: squatters, poachers, thieves. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Kadt, E. (1970). Catholic radicals in Brazil. London: Oxford University Press.
Karlsson, B.G. (2018). After Political Ecology. Anthropology Today, 34, 22–24. www.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8322.12422
Kelly-Reif, K., & Wing, S. (2016). Urban-rural exploitation: an underappreciated dimension of environmental injustice. Journal of Rural Studies, 47, 350–358. www.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.03.010
Latour, B. (2004). Politics of nature. Cambridge, MS: Harvard University Press.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassemblying the social. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lino, C. F. (1992). Reserva da biosfera da Mata Atlântica: plano de ação. Campinas: UNICAMP.
Lipton, M. (1979). Why poor people stay poor. London: Temple Smith.
Marston, S.A., Jones III, J.P., & Woodward, K. (2005). Human geography without scale. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 30, 416–432. www.doi.org/j.1475-5661.2005.00180.x
Marx, K. (1952). Capital. Chicago: Great Books.
Musumeci, L. (1987). Pequena produção e modernização da agricultura: o caso dos hortigranjeiros no estado do Rio de Janeiro. Rio de Janeiro: IPEA.
Merchant, C. (2004). Radical ecology. 2nd Edition. London: Routledge.
MMA (Ministério de Meio Ambiente). (2016). Parna Pantanal. Retrieved from www.mma.gov.br/ estruturas/205/_arquivos/parna__pantanal_205.pdf
OECO (2008). Herdeiros da guerrilha pantaneira. Retrieved from www.oeco.org.br/reportagens/20205-herdeiros-da-guerrilha-pantaneira
Oliveira, A. (1999). A geografia das lutas no campo. São Paulo: Contexto.
Oliveira, R.R., Fraga, J. S., & Berck, D.E. (2011). Uma floresta de vestígios: metabolismo social e a atividade de carvoeiros nos séculos XIX e XX no Rio de Janeiro, RJ. INTERthesis, 8, 286–315.
Page, B., & Peet, R. (1994). Nature's metropolis: the ghost dance of Christaller and von Thunen. Antipode, 26, 152–162.
Paulson, S., Gerzon, L.L., & Watts, M. (2003). Locating the political in political ecology. Human Organization, 62, 205–217. www.doi.org/10.17730/humo.62.3.e5xcjnd6y8v09n6b
Peet, R., Robbins, P. & Watts, M. (Eds.). (2011): Global political ecology. Milton Park: Routledge.
Peet, R.. & Watts, M. (Eds.). (2004) [1996]. Liberation ecologies. London: Routledge.
Pepper, D. (1996). A history of environmental thought. London: Routledge.
Rickard, T.J. (2007). Rural sustainability issues for national parks. In T. Sorensen (Ed.), Progress in sustainable rural development (pp. 191–198). Cairns: IGU Commission on the Sustainability of Rural Systems.
Prefeitura da Cidade do Rio de Janeiro. (2012). Parque Natural Municipal da Serra do Mendanha: plano de manejo. Rio de Janeiro: FUNRIO/SMAC. Retrieved from www.rio.rj.gov.br/distatic/10112/5214698/4136049/2011_06PMCaracteriza_1.pdf
Redclift, M. (1987). Sustainable development. London: Methuen.
Robbins, P. (2003). Political ecology. Oxford: Blackwell.
Schmink, M., & Wood, C.H. (1992). Contested frontiers in Amazonia. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.
Schwanen, T. (2018). Thinking complex interconnections: transition, nexus and Geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 43, 262–283. www.doi.org/10.1111/tran.12223
Simmons, I.G. (1993). Interpreting nature. Cultural constructions of the environment. London: Routledge.
Simmons, I.G., & Cox, N.J. (1985). Holistic and reductionistic approaches to geography. In R.J. Johnston (Ed.), The future of geography (pp. 43–58). London: Metheun.
SOS Mata Atlântica. (2015). SOS Mata Atlântica: história, parceiros e nossa causa. Retrieved from www.sosma.org.br
Taylor, M. (2015). The political ecology of climatic change adaptation. London: Routledge/Earthscan.
Vaz Filho, F.A. (2011). Povos indígenas no baixo Tapajós querem reconhecimento. In C.A. Ricardo & F. Ricardo (Eds.), Povos indígenas do Brasil 2006/2010 (pp. 423–426). São Paulo: ISA.
Whatmore, S. (2002). Hybrid ggeographies. London: Sage.
Wilson, A. (1992). The culture of nature. London: Routledge.
Wolf, E. (1966). Peasants. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Wolf, E. (1982). Europe and the people without history. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
WWF (World Wildlife Fund) (2016). Áreas prioritárias para conservação da biodiversidade no cerrado e pantanal. Retrieved from www.wwf.org.br/natureza_ brasileira/reducao_de_impactos2/ lep/lep_pub/?50162/reas-Prioritrias-para-conservao-da-biodiversidade-no-Cerrado-e-Pantanal
WWF (2018). Maior aumento de desmatamento da Amazônia em dez anos. Retrieved from www.wwf.org.br/?68662/ maior-aumento-desmatamento-amazonia-dez-anos#
Zimmerer, K., & Bassett, T.J. (Eds.). 2003. Political ecology: an integrative approach to geography and environment-development studies. New York: Guilford.