Democratising the interface research-policymaking in landscape planning: experiences in Friuli Venezia Giulia (Italy)

Contenido principal del artículo

Enrico Michelutti

Resumen

Democratizando la interfaz investigación-elaboración de políticas en la planificación del paisaje: experiencias en Friuli Venezia Giulia (Italia)


En la actual crisis socio-ambiental, la interfaz investigación-elaboración de políticas en la planificación del paisaje ha evolucionado buscando respuestas a dinámicas globales (cambio climático, flujos migratorios internacionales, etc.) y demandas locales (reconocimiento de derechos comunitarios, “gobernanza pública” de proyectos de paisaje, etc.). Dependiendo de condiciones contextuales, diferentes agendas políticas y marcos legales han dado forma distinta a las interacciones entre mecanismos de producción de conocimiento y prácticas de planificación del paisaje. Desde esta perspectiva, la evolución de la interfaz investigación-elaboración de políticas incluye las interacciones entre las políticas formales de investigación y los procesos informales de generación de conocimiento, el uso (ideológico) de la participación en las practicas/proyectos de paisaje y la redefinición de los equilibrios de poder en la planificación. Explorando las experiencias de planificación del paisaje desarrolladas en Friuli Venezia Giulia, Italia (planes territoriales que involucran normas de conservación del paisaje, planes regionales del paisaje, “proyectos de paisaje integrados”), el articulo plantea la necesidad de reorientar la gobernanza del paisaje y la formulación de políticas hacia formas factuales de inclusión, fomentando iniciativas de coproducción de conocimiento a todos los niveles y (re)pensando el poder como factor complejo de cambio en las relaciones entre las autoridades de planificación, el mundo académico, las comunidades locales y los ciudadanos.



Descargas

La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.

Detalles del artículo

Cómo citar
Michelutti, E. (2022). Democratising the interface research-policymaking in landscape planning: experiences in Friuli Venezia Giulia (Italy) . Boletín De La Asociación De Geógrafos Españoles, (94). https://doi.org/10.21138/bage.3275

Bibliografía

Ahern, J. (2013). Urban landscape sustainability and resilience: the promise and challenges of integrating ecology with urban planning and design. Landscape Ecology, 28(6), 1203-1212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-012-9799-z

Albert, C., Zimmermann, T., Knieling, J., & von Haaren, C. (2012). Social learning can benefit decision-making in landscape planning: Gartow case study on climate change adaptation, Elbe Valley Biosphere Reserve. Landscape and Urban Planning, 105(4), 347-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.12.024

Alfaro-d’Alençon, A., Boanada-Fuchs, A., Greene, M., Krishnamurthy, S., Michelutti, E., Moretto, L., & Smit, W. (2022). Engaging Urban Research in Policy Making towards Equitable Economic Growth. A partnership between Cities Alliance, AURI, REDEUS_LAC and N-AERUS, TU Berlin Verlag (forthcoming).

Arler, F. (2011). Landscape democracy in a globalizing world: The case of Tange Lake. Landscape Research, 36(4), 487-507. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2011.583009

Bassi, I., Gori, E., & Iseppi, L. (2019). Assessing environmental awareness towards protection of the Alps: a case study. Land Use Policy, 87, 104028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104028

Benson, L. (2009). Social and political aspects of urban ecology: Possibilities and constraints for civic actors to influence urban green area planning at Årstafältet. Stockholm Department of Systems Ecology, Stockholm University.

Beunen, R., & Opdam, P. (2011). When landscape planning becomes landscape governance, what happens to the science? Landscape and Urban Planning, 100(4), 324-326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.01.018

Bianchetti, A., & Guaran, A. (2019). The participatory process: a review (Il processo partecipativo: una rilettura di prospettiva). In A. Guaran & M. Pascolini (Eds.), Pianificazione e governo del paesaggio: analisi, strategie, strumenti. Il conributo dell’universita’ di Udine al Piano Paesaggistico Regionale del FVG [Landscape planning and governance: Analysis, Strategies, Instruments. The pluridisciplinary contribution of the University of Udine to the FVG RLP]. Forum Editrice, Udine.

Bormpoudakis, D., & Tzanopoulos, J. (2019). The science-practice interface of connectivity in England. Landscape Ecology, 34(11), 2669-2685. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-019-00913-9

Butler, A., & Berglund, U. (2014). Landscape character assessment as an approach to understanding public interests within the European Landscape Convention. Landscape Research, 39(3), 219-236. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2012.716404

Calderon, C., & Butler, A. (2020). Politicising the landscape: a theoretical contribution towards the development of participation in landscape planning. Landscape Research, 45(2), 152-163. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2019.1594739

Castella, J.C., Bourgoin, J., Lestrelin, G., & Bouahom, B. (2014). A model of the science-practice-policy interface in participatory land-use planning: lessons from Laos. Landscape Ecology, 29(6), 1095-1107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-014-0043-x

Colavitti, A.M., Floris, A., & Serra, S. (2021). Mind the Gap: Why the Landscape Planning System in Sardinia Does Not Work. Sustainability, 13(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137300

Conrad, E., Cassar, L., Jones, M., Eiter, S., Izaovičová, Z., Barankova, Z., Christie, M., & Fazey, I. (2011a). Rhetoric and reporting of public participation in landscape policy. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 13(1), 23-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2011.560449

Conrad, E., Christie, M., & Fazey I. (2011b). Is research keeping up with changes in landscape policy? A review of the literature. Journal of Environmental Management, 92(9), 2097-2108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.04.003

Council of Europe (2017). Recommendation of the committee of ministers to member States on the contribution of theEuropean landscape convention to the exercise of human rights and democracy with a view to sustainable development. Council of Europe, Strasbourg.

Davoudi, S. (2006). The Evidence – Policy Interface in Strategic Waste Planning for Urban Environments: The ‘Technical’ and the ‘Social’ Dimensions. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 24(5), 681-700. https://doi.org/10.1068/c0609j

Déjeant-Pons, M. (2006). The European landscape convention. Landscape Research, 31(4), 363-384. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426390601004343

Enengel, B., Muharb, A., Penkerc, M., Freyerd, B., Drlike, S., & Ritter, S. (2012). Co-production of knowledge in transdisciplinary doctoral theses on landscape development. An analysis of actor roles and knowledge types in different research phases. Landscape and Urban Planning, 105(1-2), 106-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.12.004

Egoz S., Jørgensen K., & Ruggeri D. (Eds.) (2018). Defining Landscape Democracy: A Path to Spatial Justice. Elgar.

Egoz, S., Makhzoumi, J., & Pungetti, G. (2011). The right to landscape: Contesting landscape and human rights. Ashgate Publishing Limited.

Ernstson, H. (2013). The social production of ecosystem services: A framework for studying environmental justice and ecological complexity in urbanized landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 109(1), 7-17.

Fabian, L., Donadoni, E., & Munarin, S. (Eds.) (2015). Re-Cycle Veneto, Re-Cycle Italy. Aracne.

Fischer, F. (2009). Democracy and Expertise: Reorienting Policy Inquiry. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Freeman, O.E., Duguma, L.A., & Minang, P.A. (2015). Operationalizing the integrated landscape approach in practice. Ecology and Society, 20(1), 24. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-07175-200124

FVG (2017). Official Bulletin (Bollettino Ufficiale), 43, Decreto del Direttore del Servizio Biodiversità e Paesaggio [Decree of the Director of the Office for biodiversity and landscape], n. 7507, Trieste.

FVG (2013). Piano di Governo del Territorio [Plan for the Governance of the Territory], Rapporto di Analisi del Territorio Regionale [Analytical Report of the Regional Territory], DGR n. 693, Trieste.

FVG (2018). Piano Paesaggistico Regionale. Relazione generale [Regional Landscape Plan. Executive report]. Trieste.

FVG (2007). Piano Territoriale Regionale [Regional Territorial Plan], Norme di Attuazione [Implementing Regulations], L.R. 23, n.5, Trieste.

Gailing, L., & Leibenath, M. (2017). Political landscapes between manifestations and democracy, identities and power. Landscape Research, 42(4), 337-348. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2017.1290225

Gruehn, D. (2010). Validity in landscape function assessment methods—a scientific basis for landscape and environmental planning in Germany. The Problems of Landscape Ecology, 28, 191-200.

Guaran A., & Michelutti, E. (2018). Knowledge Co-production on Landscape Characters, Visions and Planning: The Case of the Regional Landscape Plan in Friuli Venezia Giulia (Italy). Territorial Identity and Development, 3(1), 38-51. http://doi.org/10.23740/TID120183

Guaran, A., & Michelutti, E. (2019a). I processi partecipativi nella pianificazione paesaggistica in Italia [Participatory processes in Italian landscape planning]. Semestrale di studi e ricerche di geografia, XXXI(2), 103-116. https://doi.org/10.13133/1125-5218.16205

Guaran, A., & Michelutti, E. (2019b). Il Piano paesaggistico regionale del Friuli Venezia Giulia come esperienza di co-produzione di conoscenza: (strumenti per) un’analisi delle reti di attori (The Regional Landscape Plan of Friuli Venezia Giulia as knowledge co-production experience: (tools for) an analysis of actors’ networks). In A. Guaran & M. Pascolini (Eds.), Pianificazione e governo del paesaggio: analisi, strategie, strumenti. L’apporto pluridisciplinare dell’Università di Udine al Piano Paesaggistico Regionale del Friuli Venezia Giulia (pp. 129-142) [Landscape planning and governance: analysis, strategies and instruments. The contribution of the University of Udine]. Forum.

Healey, P. (2007). Urban Complexity and Spatial Strategies. Towards a Relational Planning for Our Times. Routledge.

Hedblom, M., Andersson, E., & Borgström, S. (2017). Flexible land-use and undefined governance: From threats to potentials in peri-urban landscape planning. Land Use Policy, 63, 523-527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.02.022

Hering, J.G. (2016). Do we need “more research” or better implementation through knowledge brokering? Sustainability Science, 11(2), 363-369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-015-0314-8

Hernandez-Morcillo, M., Bieling, C., Burgi, M., Lieskovsky, J., Palang, H., Printsmann, A., Schulp, C.J.E., Verburg, P.H., & Plieninger, T. (2017). Priority questions for the science, policy and practice of cultural landscapes in Europe. Landscape Ecology, 32(11), 2083-2096. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-017-0524-9

Hughes, T., O’Regan, N., & Wornham, D. (2008). The credibility issue: closing the academic/practitioner gap. Strategic Change, 17(7-8), 215-233. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.828

Innes, J., & Booher, D. (2016). Collaborative rationality as a strategy for working with wicked problems. Landscape and Urban Planning, 154, 8-10.

Jones, M. (2007). The European Landscape Convention and the question of public participation. Landscape Research, 32(5), 613-633. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426390701552753

Karrasch, L., Maier, M., Kleyer, M., & Klenke, T. (2017). Collaborative Landscape Planning: Co-Design of Ecosystem-Based Land Management Scenarios. Sustainability, 9(9), 1668. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9091668

Marson, A. (2019). The case of landscape planning in Italy, Ri-Vista. Research for Landscape Architecture, 17(2), 16-23. https://doi.org/10.13128/rv-8311

McKenzie, E., Posner, S., Tillmann, P., Bernhardt, J.R., Howard, K., & Rosenthal, A. (2014). Understanding the use of ecosystem service knowledge in decision making: Lessons from international experiences of spatial planning. Environment and Planning C. Politics and Space, 32(2), 320-340. https://doi.org/10.1068/c12292j

McNie, E.C. (2007). Reconciling the supply of scientific information with user demands: an analysis of the problem and review of the literature. Environmental Science and Policy, 10, 17-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2006.10.004

Mels, T. (2016). The trouble with representation: Landscape and environmental justice. Landscape Research, 41(4), 417-424. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2016.1156071

Mercado-Alonso, I., Fernández-Tabales, A., & Muñoz-Yules, O. (2018). Perceptions and social valuations of landscape. Objectives and methodology for citizen participation in landscape policies. Landscape Research, 43(1), 95-111. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2017.1302570

Michelutti, E., & Guaran, A. (2019). Un approccio plurale ai paesaggi della conflittualità: l’esperienza di pianificazione paesaggistica in Friuli Venezia Giulia (A plural approach to the conflictive landscapes: the landscape planning experience of Friuli Venezia Giulia). Ri-Vista. Ricerche per la progettazione del paesaggio, 2. https://doi.org/10.13128/rv-8314

Michelutti, E., & Guaran, A. (2020). Landscape Education in Planning Experiences: the Case of the Regional Landscape Plan of Friuli Venezia Giulia (Italy). Landscape Research, 47(2), 195-210. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2020.1808958

Ministry of Heritage and Cultural Activities (2004). Decreto Legislativo n.42 Codice dei beni culturali e del paesaggio [Legislative Decree 42 Codex of the cultural goods and landscape]. Rome.

Montembault, D. (2015). Participation et renouvellement des pratiques paysagistes. https://okina.univ-angers.fr/publications/ua15282/1/2015_ouvrage_pdd2.pdf

Mouffe, C. (2005). On the Political - Thinking in action. Routledge.

Neuendorf, F., von Haaren, C., Albert, C. (2018). Assessing and coping with uncertainties in landscape planning: an overview. Landscape Ecology, 33(6), 861-878. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-018-0643-y

Olwig, K.R., & Mitchell, D. (2008). Justice, Power and the Political Landscape. Routledge.

Olwig, K.R., & Olwig, K.F. (2021). Landscape, justice and the quality of life in emblematically embodied nation/states – the case of Denmark. Landscape Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2021.1893289

Opdam, P., Coninx, I., Dewulf, A., Steingröver, E., Vos, C., & Van der Wal, M. (2015). Framing ecosystem services: Affecting behaviour of actors in collaborative landscape planning? Land Use Policy, 46, 223-231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.02.008

Opdam, P., Westerink, J., Vos, C., & de Vries., B. (2015). The role and evolution of boundary concepts in transdisciplinary landscape planning. Planning Theory and Practice, 16(1), 63-78. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2014.997786

Parrott, L., & Meyer, W.S. (2012). Future landscapes: managing within complexity. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10(7), 382-389. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/110082

Pascolini, M. (2019). Beyond the norm: the strategic part of the Regional Landscape Plan of Friuli Venezia Giulia. Ri-Vista. Research for Landscape Architecture, 17(2), 40-49. https://doi.org/10.13128/rv-8313

Reed, J., van Vianen, J., Barlow, J., & Sunderland, T. (2017). Have integrated landscape approaches reconciled societal and environmental issues in the tropics? Land Use Policy, 63, 481-492. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.02.021

Ros-Tonen M.A.F., Reed J., & Sunderland, T. (2018). From Synergy to Complexity: The Trend Toward Integrated Value Chain and Landscape Governance. Environmental Management, 62(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-018-1055-0

Ruckelshaus, M., McKenzie, E., Tallis, H., Guerry, A., Daily, G., Kareiva, P., Polasky, S., Ricketts, T., Bhagabati, N., Wood, S.A., & Bernhardt, J. (2015). Notes from the field: lessons learned from using ecosystem service approaches to inform real-world decisions. Ecological Economics, 115, 11-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.07.009

Sayer, J., Margules, C., Boedhihartono, A.K., Dale, A., Sunderland, T., Supriatna, J., & Saryanthi, R. (2015). Landscape approaches; what are the pre-conditions for success? Sustainability Science, 10, 345-355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-014-0281-5

Sayer, J., Endamana, D., Boedhihartono, A.K., Ruiz-Perez, M., & Breuer, T. (2016). Learning from change in the Sangha Tri-national landscape. International Forestry Review, 18(S1), 130-139. https://doi.org/10.1505/146554816819683771

Scheller, R. (2020). Managing Landscapes for Change. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62041-7

Scherr, S.J., Shames, S., & Friedman, R. (2013). Defining Integrated Landscape Management for Policy Makers. Ecoagriculture Policy Focus, 10.

Scott, A. (2011). Beyond the conventional: meeting the challenges of landscape governance within the European Landscape Convention? Journal of Environmental Management, 92(10), 2754-2762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.06.017

Selman, P. (2012). Sustainable landscape planning: The reconnection agenda. Routledge.

Stephenson, J. (2010). People and place. Planning Theory & Practice, 11(1), 9-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649350903549878

Strecker, A. (2018). Landscape Protection in International Law. Oxford University Press.

van Vianen, J., Reed, J., & Sunderland, T. (2015). From global complexity to local reality: Aligning implementation pathways for the Sustainable Development Goals and landscape approaches. https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/005865

Terkenli, T.S. (2020). Landscape and justice: the case of Greeks, space and law. Landscape Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2020.1846021

Vik, M. (2017). Self-mobilisation and lived landscape democracy: Local initiatives as democratic landscape practices. Landscape Research, 42, 400-411. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2017.1290223

Westberg, L., & Waldenström, C. (2017). How can we ever create participation when we are the ones who decide? Onnatural resource management practice and its readiness for change. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 19(6), 654-667. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2016.1264298

Westerink, J., Opdam, P., van Rooij, S., & Steingrover, E. (2017). Landscape services as boundary concept in landscape governance: building social capital in collaboration and adapting the landscape. Land Use Policy, 60, 408-418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.11.006

Wu, C.-J., Isaksson, K., & Antonson, H. (2017). The struggle to achieve holistic landscape planning: Lessons from planning the E6 road route through Tanum World Heritage Site, Sweden. Land Use Policy, 67, 167-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.05.036

Wu, J. (2013). Landscape sustainability science: ecosystem services and human well-being in changing landscapes. Landscape Ecology, 28(6), 999-1023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-013-9894-9