Pobreza y segregación racial en la financiación gubernamental de los servicios asistenciales estadounidenses
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
Las políticas públicas en materia de servicios asistenciales diseñadas por el gobierno norteamericano no quedan exentas de cierta dimensión ideológica que fundamenta el sistema de prestación de dichos servicios. Tomando como punto de partida una revisión crítica de los conceptos de justicia espacial y segregación social, se diseña una metodología geoestadística multinivel para estudiar la distribución de dichas organizaciones financiadas por la administración en aras de evaluar la posible variación espacial en función de su relación con diferentes patrones de segregación social considerados.
Descargas
Detalles del artículo
Bibliografía
Alba, R. D., y Logan, J. R. (1993). Minority proximity to whites in suburbs: an individual level analysis of segregation. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 1388-1427.
Alba, R. D., Logan, J. R., y Stults, B. J. (2000). How Segregated Are Middle-Class African Americans? Social Problems, 47, 543-558.
Allard, S. W. (2009). Out of reach: Place, poverty and the new American welfare state. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Ben Ner, A., y Van Hoomissen, T. (1992). An empirical investigation of the joint determination of the size of the for-profit, non-profit, and voluntary sectors. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 63, 391-415.
Bielefeld, W. (2000). Metropolitan nonprofit sectors: findings from NCCS data. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29, 297-314.
Boris, E.T., Leon, E., Roeger, K.L., y Nikolova, M. (2010). Human Service Nonprofits and Government Collaboration. Findings from the 2010 National Survey of Nonprofit Government Contracting and Grants. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
Clark, W. (1996). Residential patterns: Avoidance, assimilation, and succession. En R. Waldinger M. Bozorgmehr (Eds.), Ethnic Los Angeles (pp. 109-138) Nueva York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Emerson, M. O., Chai, K. J., y Yancey, G. (2001). Does Race Matter in Residential Segregation? Exploring the Preferences of White Americans. American Sociological Review, 66, 922-935.
Frey, W. H., y Farley, R. (1996). Latino, Asian and Black Segregation in U.S. Metropolitan Areas: Are Multiethnic Metros Different? Demography, 33(1), 35-50.
Fording, R. C. (1997). The conditional effect of violence as a political tactic: mass insurgency, welfare generosity, and electoral context in the American states. American Journal of Political Science, 41, 1-29.
Garrow, E. E. (2011). Receipt of Government Revenue among Nonprofit Human Service Organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21, 445-471.
Garrow, E. E. (2012). Does Race Matter in Government Funding of Nonprofit Human Service Organizations? The Interaction of Neighborhood Poverty and Race. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24, 381-405.
Garrow, E. E., y Hasenfeld, Y. (2014). Institutional Logics, Moral Frames, and Advocacy: Explaining the Purpose of Advocacy Among Nonprofit Human-Service Organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43, 80-98.
Gilens, M. (1999). Why Americans hate welfare: Race, media and the politics of antipoverty policy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Gronjberg, K. (1993). Understanding nonprofit funding: Managing revenues in social services and community development. San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass.
Gronjberg, K. (2001). The U.S. nonprofit human service sector: A creeping revolution. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30, 276-297.
Hasenfeld, Y., y Evans, L. (2004). The Role of Non-Profit Agencies in the Provision of Welfare-to-Work Services. Administration In Social Work, 28, 91-110.
Hedeker, D. (2005). Generalized Linear Mixed Models. Encyclopedia of Statistics in Behavioral Science. John Wiley & Sons.
Hero, R. E. (1998). Faces of inequality: Social diversity in American politics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
ICPSR, Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. Recuperado el 21 de octubre, de 2015 de http://www.icpsr.umich.edu
Jiang, J. (2007). Linear and Generalized Linear Mixed Models and Their Applications. Springer.
Joassart-Marcelli, P., y Wolch, J. (2003). The intra-metropolitan geography of poverty and the nonprofit sector in Southern California. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 32, 70-96.
Kinder, D. R., y Sanders, L. (1996). Divided by color: Racial politics and democratic ideals. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Laird, N. M., y Ware, J. H. (1982). Random-effects models for longitudinal data. Biometrics, 38, 963-974.
Logan, J. R., Richard D. A., McNulty, T., y Fisher, B. (1996). Making a place in the metropolis: Locational attainment in cities and suburbs. Demography, 33, 443-453.
Massey, D. S., y Denton, N. A. (1993). American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Matsunaga, Y., y Yamauchi, N. (2004). Is the government failure theory still relevant? A panel analysis using US state level data. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 75, 227-263.
McCullagh, P,. y Nelder, J.A. (1989). Generalized Linear Models. Nueva York: Chapman & Hall.
Mosley, J. E. (2012). Keeping the Lights On: How Government Funding Concerns Drive the Advocacy Agendas of Nonprofit Homeless Service Providers. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22, 841-866.
Nelder, J. A., y Wedderburn, R. W. M. (1972). Generalized linear models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 135(A), 370-384.
NCCS (National Center for Charitable Statistics). Recuperado el 9 de octubre de 2015, de http://nccs.urban.org/
Peck, L. R. (2007). Do Antipoverty Nonprofits Locate Where People Need Them? Evidence From a Spatial Analysis of Phoenix. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 37, 138-151.
PSCUM (Population Studies Center at the University of Michigan, Racial Residential Segregation Measurement Project). Recuperado el 9 de octubre de 2015 de http://enceladus.isr.umich.edu/race/racestart.asp
Quillian, L. (2014). Does Segregation Create Winners and Losers? Residential Segregation and Inequality in Educational Attainment. Social Problems, 61(3), 402-426.
Raudenbush, S. W., y Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Chicago, IL: Sage Publications, University of Chicago.
Salamon, L. M. (1992). Social services. En C. T. Clotfelter (Ed.), Who benefits from the nonprofit sector? (pp. 134-173) Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Salamon, L. M. (1995). Partners in public service. Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins University Press.
Salamon, L. M., y Toepler, S. (2015). Government-Nonprofit Cooperation: Anomaly or Necessity? Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 26, 2155-2177.
Saxton, G. D., y Benson, M. A. (2005). Social capital and the growth of the nonprofit sector. Social Science Quarterly, 86(1), 16-35.
Schneider, A., y Ingram, H. (1993). Social construction of target populations: Implications for politics and policy. American Political Science Review, 8, 334-347.
Smith, S. R. (2002). Social services. En L. M. Salamon (Ed.), The state of nonprofit America (pp. 149-186). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Small, M. L., y Mcdermott, M. (2006). The presence of organizational resources in poor urban neighborhoods: An analysis of average and contextual effects. Social Forces, 84, 1697-1724.
Smith, S. R., y Lipsky, M. (1993). Nonprofits for hire: The welfare state in the age of contracting. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Soss, J., Fording, R. C., y Schram, S. F. (2008). The color of devolution: Race, federalism, and the politics of social control. American Journal of Political Science, 52, 536-553.
Soss, J., Schram, S. F., Vartanian, T., y O’Brien, E. (2001). Setting the terms of relief: Explaining state policy choices in the devolution revolution. American Journal of Political Science, 45, 378 395.
Stroup, W. W. (2012). Generalized Linear Mixed Models. CRC Press.
Suarez, D. F. (2011). Collaboration and professionalization: The contours of public sector funding for nonprofit organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21, 307-326.
United States Department of Labor. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Recuperado el 21 de octubre, de 2015 de http://www.bls.gov/
United States Census Bureau. American Factfinder. Recuperado el 21 de octubre de 2015, de http://factfinder.census.gov
United States Census Bureau (2002). 2002 Census of Governments, vol. 4, nº 3, Finances of County Governments: 2002. GC02(4)-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Voter News Service (2000). Voter News Service General Election Exit Polls, 2000. 2nd ICPSR version. Nueva York, NY: Voter News Service. Recuperado el 21 de octubre, de 2015 de http://dataarchives.ss.ucla.edu/
Wolch, J., Wilson, J. P., y Fehrenbach, J. (2005). Parks and park funding in Los Angeles: An equity-mapping analysis. Urban Geography, 26, 4-35.
Wolpert, J. (1993). Patterns of generosity in America: Who’s holding the safety net? Nueva York, NY: Twentieth Century Fund.
Wells, R., Pérez, M., Chuang, E., Mcbeath, B., y Collins-Camargo, C. (2014). Trends in local public child welfare agencies 1999-2009. Children and Youth Services Review, 38, 93-100.
Young, D. R. (2006). Complementary, supplementary, or adversarial? Nonprofit-government relations. En E. T. Boris y C. E. Steuerle (Eds.), Nonprofits & government: Collaboration & conflict (pp. 37-79) (2º ed). Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.